ATO raises alarm on asset protection scheme for SMSFs
The ATO is concerned about SMSFs entering into certain asset protection arrangements that involve a ‘Vestey Trust’.
.
In a recent online update, the ATO said it is concerned about asset protection arrangements that claim to protect SMSF assets from creditors by mortgaging them to an asset protection trust, commonly referred to as a ‘Vestey Trust’.
The ATO explained that a Vestey Trust is a discretionary trust established by deed.
“It is claimed that the trust is set up to acquire the equity in the SMSF’s assets through an equitable mortgage,” the Tax Office stated.
“The equitable mortgage is supported by the execution of a promissory note by the SMSF to the Vestey Trust. This recognises a debt is owed by the SMSF to the Vestey Trust. The mortgage is also supported by a caveat by the Vestey Trust over the SMSF’s real property.”
The arrangement can also allow a transfer of the SMSF’s cash holdings to a bank account in the name of the Vestey Trust.
The ATO advised SMSF trustees that the arrangement is unnecessary because the super system already protects SMSF assets from creditors.
It also warned SMSFs that the arrangement is a compliance risk and may contravene one or more super laws.
“For example, it may result in the giving of a ‘charge’ over, or in relation to, a fund asset by the SMSF trustee or involve the borrowing of money by the SMSF trustee,” the ATO cautioned.
“[It may also] expose fund assets to unnecessary risk if it’s not clear who owns them or cause the fund to be maintained in a way that doesn’t comply with the sole purpose test.”
The ATO also reminded trustees that SMSF money cannot be used for costs related to asset protection arrangements entered into by members to protect their personal or business assets because these expenses are not incurred in running the SMSF.
“If the arrangement contravenes the super laws, penalties may apply,” it cautioned.
The ATO is encouraging any trustees that have become involved in a scheme like this to make a voluntary disclosure.
“We will take this into account when determining our compliance action,” it said.
Miranda Brownlee
05 January 2023
smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- ATO encourages trustees to use voluntary disclosure service
- Beware of terminal illness payout time frame
- Capital losses can help reduce NALI
- Investment and economic outlook, August 2024
- What the Reserve Bank’s rates stance means for property borrowers
- How investing regularly can propel your returns
- Super sector in ASIC’s sights
- Most Popular Operating Systems 1999 - 2022
- Our investment and economic outlook, July 2024
- Striking a balance in the new financial year
- The five reasons why the $A is likely to rise further - if recession is avoided
- What super fund members should know when comparing returns
- Insurance inside super has tax advantages
- It’s never too early to start talking about aged care with clients
- Capacity doubts now more common
- Most Gold Medals in Summer Olympic Games (1896-2024)
- SMSF assets reach record levels amid share market rally
- Many Australians have a fear of running out
- How to get into the retirement comfort zone
- NALE bill passed by parliament
- Compliance focus impacts wind-ups
- LRBA interest rates increase for 2025
- Income-free areas set to increase from 1 July
- Most Spoken Languages in the World
- Middle-to-higher incomes boosting SMSF growth
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2024
- Transitioning into retirement: What you should know
- Plan now to take advantage of stage 3 tax cuts
- Deeming freeze a win for Age Pensioners
Article archive
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
- January - March 2015
- October - December 2014
January - March 2023 archive
- China’s economic rebound lowers the odds of a global recession
- No plans to extend NALI compliance relief, says ATO
- Why most investors want human advice
- Comparison: How Long It Takes To Decompose?
- Contribution caps to stay the same for 2023–24 year
- Three simple steps for financial wellness
- Draft super objective to ‘protect super from interference’
- Beating back inflation, but at what cost?
- Why superannuation fund fees matter
- 100 Most Influential people in the world.
- TBC set for double indexation from 1 July
- ATO issues fresh warning on illegal early access schemes
- When to be proactive about your portfolio
- Digital advice firm optimistic QAR will ‘reset financial advice’
- 2022 by the numbers
- ATO raises alarm on asset protection scheme for SMSFs
- Downsizer age reduction now in force
- SMSFs cautioned on ‘strict conditions’ with SMSF lending
- Countries with the highest GDP per capita between 1800-2040
- Transitioning into retirement: What you should know
- Auditor flags surprising traps with e-signatures and SMSFs
- A review of the last two decades in investing