High-risk LRBAs, TBAR on the ATO’s radar this year
LRBA - Limited recourse borrowing arrangements
TBAR - Transfer balance account reporting
With LRBAs and TBAR two of the major focus areas for the ATO this year, the tax office has announced plans to contact trustees with high concentration risk in their funds and toughen its stance on misreporting.
ATO assistant commissioner Dana Fleming said that while there are a few different areas that the ATO is monitoring following the reforms to the superannuation sector, riskier limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs) and failures with reporting under the transfer balance accounting reporting regime are two areas it rates as medium or high-risk.
LRBAs
Ms Fleming said that the ATO has concerns about the existing population of SMSFs that may have entered into LRBAs on the basis of poor or conflicted advice, as seen recently in the royal commission and ASIC reports 575 and 576 that were released last year.
“The main point that I’d like to make here is that 95 per cent of LRBAs are for real property, and 30 per cent of them are secured with personal guarantees, which means that the personal assets of the SMSF members are at risk if they are unable to meet the obligations of that LRBA,” Ms Fleming said.
“We have also identified examples of concentration risk, and what I mean by that is that over 90 per cent of the assets in the SMSF are in one property. In the current landscape of the declining property market, particularly in Melbourne and Sydney, that does cause us concerns.”
Ms Fleming said that the ATO’s response in this area will partly depend on the outcomes of the report to be handed down by the Council of Financial Regulators on whether the use of LRBAs poses risks and the upcoming election.
“In the interim, however, we do think there are some risks in the current population. Trustees are legally obliged under the SIS Act to consider appropriate diversification and liquidity risk within their SMSF,” she noted.
“Where we identify these cases of concentration risk, we will be writing to trustees to ensure they have adequately understood and mitigated these risks. We recognise that trustees may have well in place an adequate strategy that deals with these risks, but we’re not sure [at this point].”
Transfer balance account reporting (TBAR)
While Ms Fleming acknowledged that the 2018–19 financial year has been a transitional year for the SMSF industry in terms of transfer balance account reporting, the ATO has identified a couple of areas of concern.
“We have found high levels of re-reporting after the ATO has already issued a determination or a commutation authority,” she said.
In most cases, she said, the re-reporting has either amended the starting value of the pension, reported a commutation of a pension on the same day it started or removed the pension completely.
“We’ve revoked around 40 per cent of commutation authorities as a result of re-reporting,” she said.
“However, from 1 July this year, we will be following up with funds where a member is prima facie in excess of their transfer balance cap and their SMSF re-reports after we have issued the member with a determination or a commutation authority to the SMSF such that miraculously an excess no longer exists.”
Another problem area is the reporting of capped defined benefit income streams.
“In 2018, around 86 per cent of the SMSFs reporting a capped defined benefit stream have failed in their reporting obligations,” she said.
“This last one is a new obligation imposed on trustees and I think it just signals to us a lack of awareness about the need to report.”
Ms Fleming said that it’s important to remember that even if the fund has a nil holding requirement, there is still a need to issue a payment summary to the member and the ATO.
“If you think you might be in this situation, you do still need to register PAYG withholding and issue that payment summary and complete the appropriate withholding section on your activity statement,” she explained.
“We are conscious that there is a lack of awareness here and we’ll be issuing web guidance on this and we’ll be writing to all those who are affected to make them aware of their obligations.”
Miranda Brownlee
01 March 2019
smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- ATO encourages trustees to use voluntary disclosure service
- Beware of terminal illness payout time frame
- Capital losses can help reduce NALI
- Investment and economic outlook, August 2024
- What the Reserve Bank’s rates stance means for property borrowers
- How investing regularly can propel your returns
- Super sector in ASIC’s sights
- Most Popular Operating Systems 1999 - 2022
- Our investment and economic outlook, July 2024
- Striking a balance in the new financial year
- The five reasons why the $A is likely to rise further - if recession is avoided
- What super fund members should know when comparing returns
- Insurance inside super has tax advantages
- It’s never too early to start talking about aged care with clients
- Capacity doubts now more common
- Most Gold Medals in Summer Olympic Games (1896-2024)
- SMSF assets reach record levels amid share market rally
- Many Australians have a fear of running out
- How to get into the retirement comfort zone
- NALE bill passed by parliament
- Compliance focus impacts wind-ups
- LRBA interest rates increase for 2025
- Income-free areas set to increase from 1 July
- Most Spoken Languages in the World
- Middle-to-higher incomes boosting SMSF growth
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2024
- Transitioning into retirement: What you should know
- Plan now to take advantage of stage 3 tax cuts
- Deeming freeze a win for Age Pensioners
Article archive
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
- January - March 2015
- October - December 2014
January - March 2019 archive
- When super isn't compulsory
- Investors brace for Brexit - deal or no deal
- ATO identifies SMSF contravention red flags
- Extra website resources and tools is one way we offer you and your family more.
- Tax and estate planning traps flagged with pension restructures
- A checklist for a healthy financial year
- High-risk LRBAs, TBAR on the ATO’s radar this year
- All you need to know about how Australia is going.
- Royal Commission report makes super fee recommendations
- Four tips for boosting your super balance
- New Year resolutions, New Year strategies
- Part 4 - The major benefit of ‘behavioural coaching'
- 3 tips for weathering the market's bumpy ride
- Common BDBN ‘pitfalls’ flagged in wake of ASIC action
- Case law points to ‘growing importance’ of SMSF document chain
- How Australia is performing.
- Global outlook summary: Down but not out
- Australia - a comprehensive run-down of our vital statistics.
- Your guide to smarter holiday reading
- Verifying asset values in a SMSF.
- Admin, BDBN errors flagged for SMSFs this year
- ATO targets non-arm's length income - NALI
- Retiring in their 30s or 40s?