Lawyer warns on ‘adverse’ death taxes with insurance
An industry lawyer has urged SMSF practitioners to carefully scrutinise any life insurance arrangements .....
..... that flow through superannuation, with payments to non-dependants continuing to result in “adverse tax ramifications”.
Estate Planning Equation director Allan Swan says where the ownership of a life insurance policy is in a superannuation fund, SMSF practitioners need to think carefully about its tax ramifications.
“If we have life insurance that flows via a superannuation fund and out as death benefits, and it’s paid as a pension to say a surviving spouse, we don’t have adverse tax ramifications,” Mr Swan said.
In situations where it is paid to an estate and goes to a surviving spouse and young children, there are also no significant tax ramifications.
“[However], if it goes to non-dependants, non-dependants for tax purposes or it gets paid to a testamentary trust that includes non-independents, the ATO gets a 15 per cent death benefits tax by virtue of it being paid to the non-dependant, plus a 15 per cent surcharge because it’s coming out as an untaxed amount, plus any levies that might be applicable,” Mr Swan said.
“So we’ll see a tax bill of 34 per cent on life insurance coming via super being paid into an estate or being paid into a testamentary trust that includes say grandchildren, nieces and nephews – too wider class of beneficiaries.”
If a testamentary trust is being used and a super fund is involved, Mr Swan said SMSF practitioners should advise their clients to limit that to people who are death benefit dependant for the purposes of the Tax Act to ensure there is no taxation problem.
Typically, death benefit dependants are a surviving spouse and/or children who are either still minors or are still financially dependent or in an interdependency relationship.
“So if they fall into any or those categories, then the trust is limited to just those beneficiaries and can’t be widened, then we’ve got a trust that won’t expose people to death benefits tax,” Mr Swan said.
“There’s effectively a 30 per cent levy rate applying to life insurance funded death benefits. We’re talking about a very high tax rate historically, in terms of death duties.”
MIRANDA BROWNLEE
Monday, 22 August 2016
www.smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- ATO encourages trustees to use voluntary disclosure service
- Beware of terminal illness payout time frame
- Capital losses can help reduce NALI
- Investment and economic outlook, August 2024
- What the Reserve Bank’s rates stance means for property borrowers
- How investing regularly can propel your returns
- Super sector in ASIC’s sights
- Most Popular Operating Systems 1999 - 2022
- Our investment and economic outlook, July 2024
- Striking a balance in the new financial year
- The five reasons why the $A is likely to rise further - if recession is avoided
- What super fund members should know when comparing returns
- Insurance inside super has tax advantages
- It’s never too early to start talking about aged care with clients
- Capacity doubts now more common
- Most Gold Medals in Summer Olympic Games (1896-2024)
- SMSF assets reach record levels amid share market rally
- Many Australians have a fear of running out
- How to get into the retirement comfort zone
- NALE bill passed by parliament
- Compliance focus impacts wind-ups
- LRBA interest rates increase for 2025
- Income-free areas set to increase from 1 July
- Most Spoken Languages in the World
- Middle-to-higher incomes boosting SMSF growth
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2024
- Transitioning into retirement: What you should know
- Plan now to take advantage of stage 3 tax cuts
- Deeming freeze a win for Age Pensioners
Article archive
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
- January - March 2015
- October - December 2014
July - September 2016 archive
- The gymnastics of keeping your portfolio balanced
- Market Update – August 2016
- Stop!! Don't do a paper Budget, use our online budgeting tools instead.
- Advisers the key to retirement stability, research shows
- The toughest tasks for self-managed super
- Lawyer warns on ‘adverse’ death taxes with insurance
- Don't get distracted by super changes
- A savings mirage?
- Market Update - July 2016
- The three biggest economic issues likely to affect markets in 2016
- SMSFs warned on looming property ‘tough times’
- Diversification counts when uncertainty beckons
- Strong economic data stablises markets
- Starting a super pension in 2016-17?
- Market Update - June 2016
- ATO extends looming SuperStream deadline
- ATO's deadline for review non-arm's length LRBAs extended
- A paradoxical relationship: The self-employed and super
- Fresh SMSF documentation warnings surface