Another telling reminder for SMSF trustees
Every so often, self-managed super cases before the Federal Court provide telling reminders for SMSF trustees about some of the most fundamental rules in superannuation.
The court gave its judgment during September in the latest of such cases. No doubt, a number of SMSF advisers will draw their clients' attention to the judge's findings.
The husband-and-wife trustees of an SMSF were personally fined $20,000 each in civil penalties for breaching the most basic rules in super.
Over a three-year period, the trustees arranged for their fund to make 68 "loans" and other payments totalling $209,677 to pay their personal expenses. These expenses included the servicing a line-of-credit debt remaining after the sale an unsuccessful business.
The "loans" were unsecured and no provision was made for the payment of interest.
As the judgment noted, the withdrawals "almost exhausted" the SMSF's assets. By June 2015, the fund had little more than $6,000 in assets.
It is worthwhile running briefly through the breaches in this case of basic superannuation law. The trustees contravened the:
- Sole-purpose test: A super fund must be maintained for the purpose of providing retirement benefits to members.
- Prohibition on loans to members: Super funds must not give financial assistance to members or their relatives.
- In-house asset rules: With certain exceptions, SMSFs are not allowed make loans, provide leases or have investments with related parties and entities that exceed 5 per cent of its total asset value. (Significantly, there is no exemption under the in-house rule to the bar on providing financial assistance to members.)
- Arm's length requirement: A fund is required to make investments on an arm's length, commercial basis.
SMSF trustees who breach such fundamental laws of super are not only risking hefty penalties but are putting their retirement savings in extreme jeopardy. In other words, they are often only hurting themselves.
By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
04 October 2015
Hot Issues
- ATO encourages trustees to use voluntary disclosure service
- Beware of terminal illness payout time frame
- Capital losses can help reduce NALI
- Investment and economic outlook, August 2024
- What the Reserve Bank’s rates stance means for property borrowers
- How investing regularly can propel your returns
- Super sector in ASIC’s sights
- Most Popular Operating Systems 1999 - 2022
- Our investment and economic outlook, July 2024
- Striking a balance in the new financial year
- The five reasons why the $A is likely to rise further - if recession is avoided
- What super fund members should know when comparing returns
- Insurance inside super has tax advantages
- It’s never too early to start talking about aged care with clients
- Capacity doubts now more common
- Most Gold Medals in Summer Olympic Games (1896-2024)
- SMSF assets reach record levels amid share market rally
- Many Australians have a fear of running out
- How to get into the retirement comfort zone
- NALE bill passed by parliament
- Compliance focus impacts wind-ups
- LRBA interest rates increase for 2025
- Income-free areas set to increase from 1 July
- Most Spoken Languages in the World
- Middle-to-higher incomes boosting SMSF growth
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2024
- Transitioning into retirement: What you should know
- Plan now to take advantage of stage 3 tax cuts
- Deeming freeze a win for Age Pensioners
Article archive
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
- January - March 2015
- October - December 2014
October - December 2015 archive
- Should we expect stormy skies or sunshine in 2016?
- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 2015
- There's no one-size-fits-all retirement income
- Market Update – 30th November 2015
- Diversifying and cutting costs with ETFs
- Why the ATO’s new powers make SMSF compliance more important than ever
- 'Unretiring' retirees
- The detrimental impact of poor SMSF record-keeping
- Counting the cost of 'grey' divorce
- Combining total-return investing with realistic investment expectations
- Market Update – 31st October 2015
- Another telling reminder for SMSF trustees
- Death in paradise – or your SMSF
- Elderly exploited for assets
- Intergenerational challenges for retirement saving
- Death benefits – navigating the minefield
- Strategy over structure
- Market Update – 3oth September 2015
- SMSF and limited resource borrowing – a warning
- External partnerships and the in-house asset rules
- Take a closer look at SMSF age demographics