‘Hefty penalties’ with TRIS payment failures, SMSFs warned
With clients who fail to pay the minimum pension payments for TRISs potentially up for illegal early release and significant penalties, SMSF practitioners have been urged to pay close attention in this area.
With failure to pay minimum pension payments for TRISs potentially resulting in illegal early release and significant penalties, SMSF practitioners have been urged to pay close attention to their clients’ pension payments.
Speaking in a webinar, DBA Lawyers director Daniel Butler said SMSF clients who have a transition to retirement income streams (TRISs) and have not yet retired can land themselves in serious trouble where they fail to meet the minimum pension payments.
Where a client fails to make the minimum pension payments, the pension ceases for that income year and the withdrawn amounts become a lump sum, he explained.
Typically, most TRISs contain preserved money only, and it is only possible for a member to take preserved money as a lump sum once the member has retired, he said.
“If it is preserved money then effectively you have an early release on your hands,” warned Mr Butler.
Therefore, unless the member has an unrestricted non-preserved amount, the fund has contravened a very important operating standard and the ATO could decide to “apply the full force of the law”, he cautioned.
“[Consequently], the client could get slammed with fully assessable income, even though the money from the TRIS was tax-free,” he said.
“Not only that, but they could potentially get an admin penalty of $4,200, so that’s a hefty penalty. If the client doesn’t have a corporate trustee, then that penalty amount could be doubled or tripled depending on the number of members in the fund.”
Mr Butler said it is vital therefore that SMSF practitioners stress to their clients the serious consequences that can arise from failing to make the minimum pension payments for their TRIS, especially where the client hasn’t retired.
Miranda Brownlee
26 October 2018
smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
- SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
- Trustees warned on early access
- The Largest Empires in the World's History