Made in Albania? How globalisation is creating challenges for Chinese policymakers
Is cheap manufacturing starting to move away from China?
Earlier this year I moved with my family from China to California to begin an exciting new chapter of our lives.
This isn't the first time I've lived in the US. I came here in 1997 for my postgraduate program and I stayed in the States for six years.

Return to sender
Last time, on visits back home to China, friends and relatives always expected me to bring gifts. Back then as a student I was on a limited budget so I went to places like Wal-Mart but pretty much everything was made in China, particularly after China's accession to the World Trade Organisation in 2001.
It made it a little difficult to buy gifts as people in China asked me why I brought them something all the way from the US that was actually made at home!
But this time around, I've seen country of origin labels from all sorts of places in the shopping malls—not just Vietnam, Indonesia and Sri Lanka but also Latin American countries like the Dominican Republic and even emerging European economies like Albania and Hungary.
So what's happened over the past 20 years?
One key trend is increasing globalisation. As the world's factory, China used to dominate global manufacturing but in recent years we've seen a boom in global trade with supply chains extending to all corners of the world. And as China has become more expensive, manufacturers have looked for ways to lower their costs.
Another trend is technological change. We're all increasingly familiar with self-checkouts at supermarkets. But self-service powered by technology is spreading. I recently went to Washington DC on a work trip and there was no-one at the hotel reception desk at night. I just punched in my details and received the door key—it was all automatic.
Incidentally, if you're interested about the impact of technology on the way we work, I encourage you to ready this fascinating piece by Vanguard Chief Economist Joe Davis about how robots will build better jobs.
Adding more value
Here in the US, these twin drivers of globalisation and technology are combining to reduce pressure on inflation and increase choice for consumers. But back home in China they are creating challenges for policymakers.
Exports have traditionally been a big driver of growth in China. Before the GFC, net exports were about 8% of GDP and that's come right down over the past decade to 2-3%. While this is partly due to the post-GFC weakening in global demand it's also because China is losing its competitiveness in low-end manufacturing.
Over the past 10 years, China's currency has appreciated, and labour and lender costs have risen significantly.
So as the era of cheap labour comes to an end in China, the challenge is for China to move up the value chain, not by making shoes or clothes or lower-end electronics but by building more critical parts of the product.
Look at the way iPhones are put together. China exports iPhones but most of the value-add doesn't happen in China. Instead, China imports the parts from Taiwan and South Korea and assembles them. So China really doesn't gain as much as it could.
While there are encouraging signs, with higher end machinery exports increasing as the share of clothing and textile exports come down, there's more work to do.
China's original transformation from a low income to a middle income economy was powered by cheap labour. But now to escape the middle income trap the key is to innovate and be more creative like neighbours Japan and South Korea.
Spoilt for choice
Looking to the future, protectionism is still a concern as the US renegotiates trade deals. But meanwhile we're likely to see globalisation continue as manufacturers look around for lower costs, depressing global inflation in the medium term and giving central bankers a challenge to reach their targets.
And back in the stores around my new home town in California, it means that next time I go shopping I'm likely to be continue to be spoilt for choice.
Qian Wang
20 November 2017
Vamguard.com.au
Hot Issues
- AI exuberance: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered
- Investment and economic outlook, November 2025
- Move assets before death to avoid tax implications
- ATO issues warning about super schemes
- 12 financial tips for the festive season and year ahead
- Birth date impacts bring-forward NCCs
- Countries with the largest collection or eucalyptus trees
- How to budget using the envelope method
- Accountants united in support for changes
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2025
- Stress-test SMSF in preparation for Div 296
- Determining what is an in-house asset can help determine investment strategy
- Beware pushy sales tactics targeting your super
- Call for SMSF ‘nudge’ in DBFO package
- How Many Countries Divided From The Largest Empire throughout history
- How changes to deeming rates could affect your pension payments
- Five building blocks that could lead to a more confident retirement
- Investment and economic outlook, September 2025
- Caution needed if moving assets to children
- Evolution of ‘ageless workers’ sees retirement age rise
- Younger Australians expect more for their retirement
- New NALE guidance still has issues
- Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
- How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding
- Common sense the best defence against fraudsters: forensic auditor
- Investment and economic outlook, August 2025
- New report highlights confusion over BDBNs
- How ‘investment procrastination’ could be hurting your wealth
- ATO warns that SAR lodgments are on its radar
- Compassionate release warning issued
