Deloitte points to ‘red flag’ SMSF patterns
Deloitte has outlined behaviours that typically do not pass the “sniff test” and can alert the ATO to potential non-compliance or suspect SMSF transactions.
As the SMSF auditing process becomes increasingly automated, focusing on “gut” instincts is where auditors can and should be applying their skill set to produce better outcomes for clients and the ATO, according to Deloitte’s SMSF audit leader Jo Heighway.
“We’re automating so much of the mundane testing now that it’s really important for auditors to be using their gut a lot more,” Ms Heighway said at the SMSF Association’s national conference in Melbourne.
Classic red flags for auditors, and ultimately the ATO, are often issues which simply “don’t seem right” when a fund’s story is looked at from a big picture perspective, Ms Heighway said.
For example, lack of documentation is a classic trigger for auditors, particularly given the ease of access to documentation today.
“Sometimes you’ll find a client has very little documentation where it’s very obvious that they should. For example, if they have shares in an unlisted company, there should be share certificates or share transfer forms,” Ms Heighway said.
“If things like that are missing, it’s an indication that things are not in order.”
Property is another area where missing documentation doesn’t pass the “sniff test,” Ms Heighway said. This particularly applies to holiday rentals, such as Airbnb.
“Trustees, in some cases, are using websites to find renters, and often the documentation trail there is poor, particularly if they can’t identify who is staying there,” she said.
Other behavioural triggers that also alert an auditor to suspect activity is a trustee’s story changing throughout the audit, slow replies to the auditor and “most obviously”, a request to withdraw.
“This is where having a good solid relationship with the client is really important. Have that honest conversation about what is causing the concern to try and move forward,” Ms Heighway said.
She stressed that auditors should not approach an audit with a ‘guilty until proven innocent’ frame of mind, but rather be open with clients and stress that auditors are not out to create notices of non-compliance and are seeking to help clients remain compliant.
“To get the best outcome, the client has got to be really comfortable with you,” Ms Heighway said.
KATARINA TAURIAN
Friday, 17 February 2017
smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
- SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
- Trustees warned on early access
- The Largest Empires in the World's History