Deloitte points to ‘red flag’ SMSF patterns
Deloitte has outlined behaviours that typically do not pass the “sniff test” and can alert the ATO to potential non-compliance or suspect SMSF transactions.

As the SMSF auditing process becomes increasingly automated, focusing on “gut” instincts is where auditors can and should be applying their skill set to produce better outcomes for clients and the ATO, according to Deloitte’s SMSF audit leader Jo Heighway.
“We’re automating so much of the mundane testing now that it’s really important for auditors to be using their gut a lot more,” Ms Heighway said at the SMSF Association’s national conference in Melbourne.
Classic red flags for auditors, and ultimately the ATO, are often issues which simply “don’t seem right” when a fund’s story is looked at from a big picture perspective, Ms Heighway said.
For example, lack of documentation is a classic trigger for auditors, particularly given the ease of access to documentation today.
“Sometimes you’ll find a client has very little documentation where it’s very obvious that they should. For example, if they have shares in an unlisted company, there should be share certificates or share transfer forms,” Ms Heighway said.
“If things like that are missing, it’s an indication that things are not in order.”
Property is another area where missing documentation doesn’t pass the “sniff test,” Ms Heighway said. This particularly applies to holiday rentals, such as Airbnb.
“Trustees, in some cases, are using websites to find renters, and often the documentation trail there is poor, particularly if they can’t identify who is staying there,” she said.
Other behavioural triggers that also alert an auditor to suspect activity is a trustee’s story changing throughout the audit, slow replies to the auditor and “most obviously”, a request to withdraw.
“This is where having a good solid relationship with the client is really important. Have that honest conversation about what is causing the concern to try and move forward,” Ms Heighway said.
She stressed that auditors should not approach an audit with a ‘guilty until proven innocent’ frame of mind, but rather be open with clients and stress that auditors are not out to create notices of non-compliance and are seeking to help clients remain compliant.
“To get the best outcome, the client has got to be really comfortable with you,” Ms Heighway said.
KATARINA TAURIAN
Friday, 17 February 2017
smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- AI exuberance: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered
- Investment and economic outlook, November 2025
- Move assets before death to avoid tax implications
- ATO issues warning about super schemes
- 12 financial tips for the festive season and year ahead
- Birth date impacts bring-forward NCCs
- Countries with the largest collection or eucalyptus trees
- How to budget using the envelope method
- Accountants united in support for changes
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2025
- Stress-test SMSF in preparation for Div 296
- Determining what is an in-house asset can help determine investment strategy
- Beware pushy sales tactics targeting your super
- Call for SMSF ‘nudge’ in DBFO package
- How Many Countries Divided From The Largest Empire throughout history
- How changes to deeming rates could affect your pension payments
- Five building blocks that could lead to a more confident retirement
- Investment and economic outlook, September 2025
- Caution needed if moving assets to children
- Evolution of ‘ageless workers’ sees retirement age rise
- Younger Australians expect more for their retirement
- New NALE guidance still has issues
- Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
- How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding
- Common sense the best defence against fraudsters: forensic auditor
- Investment and economic outlook, August 2025
