Deloitte points to ‘red flag’ SMSF patterns
Deloitte has outlined behaviours that typically do not pass the “sniff test” and can alert the ATO to potential non-compliance or suspect SMSF transactions.

As the SMSF auditing process becomes increasingly automated, focusing on “gut” instincts is where auditors can and should be applying their skill set to produce better outcomes for clients and the ATO, according to Deloitte’s SMSF audit leader Jo Heighway.
“We’re automating so much of the mundane testing now that it’s really important for auditors to be using their gut a lot more,” Ms Heighway said at the SMSF Association’s national conference in Melbourne.
Classic red flags for auditors, and ultimately the ATO, are often issues which simply “don’t seem right” when a fund’s story is looked at from a big picture perspective, Ms Heighway said.
For example, lack of documentation is a classic trigger for auditors, particularly given the ease of access to documentation today.
“Sometimes you’ll find a client has very little documentation where it’s very obvious that they should. For example, if they have shares in an unlisted company, there should be share certificates or share transfer forms,” Ms Heighway said.
“If things like that are missing, it’s an indication that things are not in order.”
Property is another area where missing documentation doesn’t pass the “sniff test,” Ms Heighway said. This particularly applies to holiday rentals, such as Airbnb.
“Trustees, in some cases, are using websites to find renters, and often the documentation trail there is poor, particularly if they can’t identify who is staying there,” she said.
Other behavioural triggers that also alert an auditor to suspect activity is a trustee’s story changing throughout the audit, slow replies to the auditor and “most obviously”, a request to withdraw.
“This is where having a good solid relationship with the client is really important. Have that honest conversation about what is causing the concern to try and move forward,” Ms Heighway said.
She stressed that auditors should not approach an audit with a ‘guilty until proven innocent’ frame of mind, but rather be open with clients and stress that auditors are not out to create notices of non-compliance and are seeking to help clients remain compliant.
“To get the best outcome, the client has got to be really comfortable with you,” Ms Heighway said.
KATARINA TAURIAN
Friday, 17 February 2017
smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- Super versus trusts: What is the best option with Div 296?
- Thinking of establishing an SMSF? Don’t skip reading the rules
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2026
- Coercive control in SMSF becoming a hot issue
- Are downsizer contributions losing steam?
- What to look for when choosing a financial adviser
- AI use needed with proper safeguards
- Most Reliable Car Brands in 2026
- ASIC targeting high-pressure sales and inappropriate advice
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2026
- Australians not underspending their super
- Five financial steps for the new year
- ASIC warns investors on pump and dump scammers
- Don’t confuse contribution with roll-over when using proceeds from small business sale
- Missed SG exemption may not be problem
- Rare and vanishing: Animals That May Go Extinct Soon
- It’s super hump month. Make the most of it
- Three timeless investing lessons from Warren Buffett
- 2026 outlook: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Care needed with ceased legacy pensions
- What had the biggest impact on the sector in 2025?
- What does 2026 look like in the SMSF sector?
- It’s not just Div 296 that could face changes in 2026
- Which country produces the most electricity annually?
- AI exuberance: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered
- Investment and economic outlook, November 2025
