Focusing on after-tax returns
Investors who focus mainly on pre-tax returns may gain a misleading impression of their real investment performance.
And, in turn, they may not give enough attention to trying to keep their tax costs - along with their other investment costs - to a minimum.
Investors have a powerful incentive to efficiently manage tax on their super and non-super portfolios given that it can potentially take a significant cut out of their returns.
Super fund researcher SuperRatings publishes a useful table each month comparing the returns of the median large super funds with balanced portfolios in the accumulation and pension phases.
In short, the table illustrates the impact of taxes even within the concessionally-taxed super environment.
For instance, SuperRatings reports (PDF) that the median balanced super fund in the accumulation phase returned an annualised 13.1 per cent over the three years to July yet 14.1 per cent in the pension phase.
The difference in the performance is, of course, due to their different tax treatment. While the earnings of super funds in the accumulation phase are concessionally taxed, super fund assets backing superannuation pensions are tax-exempt. (These super returns are published on an after-tax, after-fee basis.)
Clearly, the tax gap would be markedly larger if top marginal taxpayers were comparing the after-tax performance of identical investments held inside super and in their own names.
Significantly, Vanguard has long published after-tax returns that can be calculated for investors ranging from top personal taxpayers to tax-exempt entities (including pension-paying super funds). The size of the tax gap may surprise you, depending upon the asset class and tax comparisons selected.
One of the key ways that professional advisers can assist their clients is to advise on the efficient tax management of investment portfolios. This advice may include such fundamental issues as making the most of the concessionally-taxed super system - including in regard to taking a transition-to-retirement pension when eligible.
By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
17 September 2015
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures